Refutation and concession of my first draft.

1. What is my thesis?We can protect ourselves from the criminals by admitting that they are same with us.
2. What is the opposite position?
Criminals can't be same with us, they are psychos.
3. What arguments can I anticipate?
a) Criminals have their own reasons.
b) Breaking the prejudice is important.
4. How will I counter those arguments?

a) According to the Lee yung-hyeok, their major reason is the financial problem.
b) Without the prejudice, we could approach the crime problem humanly.

My Refutation and Concession
 Actually my argument is quite against the public opinion. Many citizen think the criminals are stationary changed people. Namely, the psychos who cannot be purified. Some of public opinions can be right. Some of the criminals cannot be purified. I agree. But I insist that some of their opinions are excessive. As I say many times, It's the hasty generalization. Maybe It's hard to purify the criminals who do the violent crimes. But not all of the criminals are the people who do the violent crimes, there are many other criminals. Their reason is different. Also it's hard to break the prejudice. My mention that the admitting that the criminals are same with us is not same with the public opinions. It doesn't mean understand them recklessly. First understand their background, their primary background is full of many bad things. And the criminals absolutely do not want these background, And these bad backgrounds affect the criminals very much. We have to consider these things. We couldn't justify the criminals just because of their bad situation. But we can help them, not justify them.
Of course, these arguments are unbelievable, until now. I agree. But also believable reasons exist. I use the korea police university's mention because these criminals apply for the korea, too. There are many crimes and the criminals. And they are spread all over the world, too. So I apply the world view, So I use the psychologytoday which is the famous site, too. They are all verified, and also have public confidence.