Classical argument outline.

1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.

I will start by using the reports which indicate that the recent crime rates are increasing. So, make people could agree with this start. After then,I will point out we usually prevent ourselves from criminal just by physical methods, but I will suggest that we have to prevent ourselves from criminals by knowing their behaviors' and admitting that they are same with us. 

2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.

I will summarize the research ' the increasing criminal rates, and the methods of preventing ourselves from the criminals.' For first one, i will show the changes from past to the present. secondly, show the most used method to the least used method to the audience.

  
3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.

I will start by using the reports which indicate that the recent crime rates are increasing. With these reports we could attract the audiences to agree with this argument and can connect our argument to the real world. And suggesting that we have to prevent ourselves not physically but psychologically, by showing the physical methods. 

4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.

I will refute that someone says that the criminals are psychos not human. By using the criminals' interview we could show the audience that they are also the human who have the emotions. I concede that it would be hard to start the prevention by admitting that they are same with us, but i will suggest that this approach would be better in long-term project. 

5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument,  and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.

I will close with a summary with the psychological traits. The bias that we think that the criminals are not same with us is related to the human mind. And breaking the bias we could approach the criminals with admitting that they are same with us. This would help the world to be peaceful and in long-term,  we could eradicate the criminals.