2014년 9월 22일 월요일
Research2
Victim's feeling: susceptibility
Article about the susceptibility to crime of people.:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/inside-the-criminal-mind/201408/are-we-all-susceptible-crimes-passion
The “crime of passion” is a misconception. Of course, crimes occur that are not premeditated or planned in advance. And yes, it would be understandable to become enraged upon discovering that one’s spouse had been unfaithful. However, most people do not react to frustration, betrayal, disappointment, and powerful threats to their self-image by committing murder. The person who commits a “crime of passion” has at least in his thinking resorted to extreme measures in response to other disturbing, threatening situations.
Susceptibility comes from the prejudice that they are psychos. We do not try to compromise them, we just get frustrated.
Victims are random, we all could be the victims.
Susceptibility from the vicitims could make the situation worse.
The reason why criminal do the crime.
Article about the criminal mind.: http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/inside-the-criminal-mind/201410/crime-may-not-be-product-criminal-mind
There is then a significant difference between the “criminality” of a starving, impoverished 18th century Irishman who steals bread during a famine merely to survive and a twenty-first century shoplifter who pilfers an items when has more than enough money to purchase it and is stealing for thrills. In 21st century America, a poor citizen does not need to steal in order to eat for he has recourse to social programs, agencies, and charities that will help provide for him. There is also a major difference between a person who is starving and has no hope of working because of a lack of jobs and an individual who rejects opportunities to work but demands at gunpoint that others surrender their valuables. And a person championing a cause in which he truly believes is very difference from a person embracing a cause to exploit it and use it as a vehicle to express his criminality.
Criminals also get guilty and the frightend.
Bad backgrounds surrounding them make them do much worse.
Criminals do not want to do the crime also.
Questions: Aren't there any methods to overcome the susceptibility?
Can't we help potential criminals some money to prevent the crime?
2014년 9월 15일 월요일
Classical argument outline.
1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I will start by using the reports which indicate that the recent crime rates are increasing. So, make people could agree with this start. After then,I will point out we usually prevent ourselves from criminal just by physical methods, but I will suggest that we have to prevent ourselves from criminals by knowing their behaviors' and admitting that they are same with us.
2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
I will summarize the research ' the increasing criminal rates, and the methods of preventing ourselves from the criminals.' For first one, i will show the changes from past to the present. secondly, show the most used method to the least used method to the audience.
3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
I will start by using the reports which indicate that the recent crime rates are increasing. With these reports we could attract the audiences to agree with this argument and can connect our argument to the real world. And suggesting that we have to prevent ourselves not physically but psychologically, by showing the physical methods.
4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I will refute that someone says that the criminals are psychos not human. By using the criminals' interview we could show the audience that they are also the human who have the emotions. I concede that it would be hard to start the prevention by admitting that they are same with us, but i will suggest that this approach would be better in long-term project.5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
I will close with a summary with the psychological traits. The bias that we think that the criminals are not same with us is related to the human mind. And breaking the bias we could approach the criminals with admitting that they are same with us. This would help the world to be peaceful and in long-term, we could eradicate the criminals.
2014년 9월 10일 수요일
Articulation.
1) My argument
: I want to argue that we could protect ourselves from the criminals by finding the feelings of us when we face the criminals. Someone says that the criminals are the psychos who cannot be predicted. But we could find it. By following the profiler's reports we can know that they are just same with us. So I think if we can find the criminal's mind, we could know the way to protect ourselves from the criminals.
2) How I found my argument
:As I say in the research proposal, I has been interested in the human mind, especially for the victims and the criminals. Actually My first dream was the profiler, but I think it is practically hard to achieve, I fold it. But when I see this persuasive essay, I think I could continue my ex-dream. The reason why i choose my dream as a profiler is that by finding the criminal's mentality, we could prevent the crimes and we could achieve the peaceful world. And also in our real world, because of the increasing interest about the crimes, this argument would be helpful.
3) New research questions
:I think more research is needed.
a) What's the reason the criminals behave crimes?
:I think we need the interview from the criminals
a) What's the reason from their interview?
4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler
:We could connect this argument to the human mind. The victims and the criminals' mind is related to the human mind, and thoughts of the normal people are especially related to the confirmation bias, because they think criminals are psychos.
: I want to argue that we could protect ourselves from the criminals by finding the feelings of us when we face the criminals. Someone says that the criminals are the psychos who cannot be predicted. But we could find it. By following the profiler's reports we can know that they are just same with us. So I think if we can find the criminal's mind, we could know the way to protect ourselves from the criminals.
2) How I found my argument
:As I say in the research proposal, I has been interested in the human mind, especially for the victims and the criminals. Actually My first dream was the profiler, but I think it is practically hard to achieve, I fold it. But when I see this persuasive essay, I think I could continue my ex-dream. The reason why i choose my dream as a profiler is that by finding the criminal's mentality, we could prevent the crimes and we could achieve the peaceful world. And also in our real world, because of the increasing interest about the crimes, this argument would be helpful.
3) New research questions
:I think more research is needed.
a) What's the reason the criminals behave crimes?
:I think we need the interview from the criminals
a) What's the reason from their interview?
4) Connections to the Harvard Sampler
:We could connect this argument to the human mind. The victims and the criminals' mind is related to the human mind, and thoughts of the normal people are especially related to the confirmation bias, because they think criminals are psychos.
피드 구독하기:
덧글 (Atom)